Finance Principles

Finance

Internal Rate of Return (IRR)

The discount rate at which an investment's NPV is exactly zero — in other words, the actual annual rate of return the investment is expected to produce.

Definition

Internal rate of return (IRR)is the discount rate at which an investment's net present value comes out to exactly zero. Put differently, it's the annual rate of return the investment is expected to actually produce over its life — the rate at which the upfront cost and the value of the future cash flows it generates exactly balance out.

Why this exists

Per Net Present Value, the standard way to judge whether an investment is worth its upfront cost is to discount its future cash flows at a chosen rate — usually the return you could otherwise get on a similarly risky investment — and see whether the result is positive or negative. That approach requires picking a discount rate before doing anything else. But often the more natural question runs the other way: given these cash flows, what rate of return is this investment actually producing? IRR answers exactly that.

IRR is the discount rate at which NPV comes out to precisely zero — the exact break-even point between the upfront cost and everything the investment pays back afterward, once the time value of money is accounted for. If the rate you'd actually require (or could get elsewhere at similar risk) is lower than the IRR, the investment is worth it, because it's expected to outperform the alternative; if your required rate is higher than the IRR, it isn't, because the alternative is actually the better use of the money.

This is why IRR and NPV are really two views of the same underlying cash flows, not two separate calculations: NPV assumes a rate and reports a dollar amount; IRR assumes a dollar amount of zero and reports a rate. Because IRR doesn't require picking a discount rate up front, it's useful for comparing very different investments on a single, rate-like number — but it can behave oddly, or even produce more than one mathematically valid answer, when cash flows switch sign multiple times over an investment's life. That's one reason NPV is generally treated as the more reliable of the two when they disagree.

Formula & mechanics

IRR is the rate that satisfies:

0 = CF₀ + CF₁/(1+IRR)¹ + CF₂/(1+IRR)² + ... + CFₙ/(1+IRR)ⁿ

Unlike Present Value or NPV, there's no way to isolate IRR algebraically for most cash flow patterns — it has to be found by trying different rates until NPV lands on (or very near) zero, which is exactly what the calculator does automatically behind the scenes.

Worked example

Using the same cash flow stream from the Net Present Value example — a $10,000 upfront cost, followed by $3,000 at the end of each of 4 years — the IRR comes out to approximately 7.71%.

This matches what was found there: at an assumed 8% discount rate — just above this 7.71% IRR — NPV was slightly negative, meaning the required rate exceeded what the investment could actually deliver. Try the IRR Calculator to see how changing any cash flow shifts this rate.

Try it yourself

Internal rate of return

7.71%

Your required rate

8.0%

NPV at 8%

-$63.62

How the math works

At 7.71%, this investment's NPV is exactly zero — that's the IRR. Compare it to your required rate of 8.0%: since the IRR is lower, this investment is expected to underperform your required rate — its NPV at 8% is negative (-$63.62).

This is the same underlying cash flow stream the Net Present Value Calculator uses — NPV assumes a rate and reports a dollar amount; IRR assumes a dollar amount of zero and reports a rate.

Common misconceptions

  • A higher IRR always means a better investment.

    IRR ignores the actual size of an investment and its cash flows. A small investment with a very high IRR can create less total value than a larger investment with a more modest IRR — NPV, which reports dollars rather than a rate, is the more reliable measure of total value created.

  • IRR and NPV always agree on whether an investment is worth it.

    They generally agree for a simple project with one upfront cost and consistently positive cash flows afterward, but can give conflicting signals for more complex cash flow patterns, or when comparing projects of very different scales.

  • There's always exactly one IRR for a given set of cash flows.

    If the cash flows change sign more than once over a project's life — money going out, then in, then out again — there can be multiple mathematically valid IRRs, or none at all. This essentially never happens for a project with a single upfront cost followed by straightforward inflows.

Also in the Glossary: Internal Rate of Return (IRR)

Related